Resolve the match before the decision
Weak or conflicting entity matches create decision risk before the action begins. Knowing what belongs together, what must stay separate and what needs review gives you the confidence to act at the right level.
Fewer wrong actions · safer automation · less manual reconciliation.
A match is a claim, not a fact
Matching is a claim about reality. Once a system says two things belong together, every downstream decision treats that claim as fact.
Identify, assess and resolve matches
Bad matching creates cost in two directions. You act on the wrong thing or you miss a connection that would have changed the decision.
-
1
Identify evidence
Use all available signals to understand whether records, relationships or cases may belong together.
-
2
Assess the match
Separate similarity from certainty and judge what the match can safely support.
-
3
Resolve the match
Merge, link, separate, review or hold the match open based on the action that follows.
Act on the right thing
Better matching helps you make decisions with clearer identity, relationship and evidence context. Matching judges whether a match is strong enough for the action it may trigger.
That means fewer unsafe merges, fewer missed connections and less review effort spent untangling weak evidence. Improve the match state and every decision that depends on it starts from a stronger position.
Why the Matching Block is different
Matches for the action
Determines what a match is strong enough to support.
Separates match from merge
Keeps useful relationships visible without forcing records together.
Preserves uncertainty
Holds unresolved matches open when the evidence is incomplete.
Controls weak evidence
Stops weak matches from driving high-impact action.
Makes matches easier to explain
Preserves the evidence, conflict and reason behind the match state.